 |
Advantages -
TECHNOLOGY AND PLANT DESIGN |
 |
|
|
Category |
SCC Technology and
Project Approach
|
SCC Advantage |
Savings |
|
TCS Production |
Simplified TCS Fluidized Bed Reactor and Scrubber/ Settler Design. |
-
Reduced capital
expense due to less equipment as compared to conventional design.
-
Reduced operating
expense due to a simplified process which results in minimal downtime.
-
Superior performance:
|
-
$15
million capital savings.
-
10%
reduction in operating cost (energy, utilities, labor, materials) as
compared to conventional design.
|
|
|
TCS Purification |
Customized purification train designed to remove key impurity species down
to ppb levels. |
-
SCC’s unique
proprietary distillation design model allows for proper removal of key
impurities in the TCS while minimizing waste.
-
Non-conventinal
control methodology based upon real world operating experience is
utilized.
-
The combination of 1
and 2 above allows for a reduction in capital expense since one (possibley
two) less distillation columns are needed to achieve the desired purity
(as compared to conventional designs).
|
-
$10
million in capital savings due to reduction in number of distillation
columns.
-
Capital savings of ~$5 million due to elimination of DCS recovery step.
-
10%
reduction in operating cost (energy, utilites, labor, materials).
|
|
|
Distillation
Section of PCS Reactor and STC Convertor Effluent Gas Recovery Area |
Customized separation and purification of effluent gas recovery
chlorosilanes. |
-
SCC’s customized
purification equipment is designed to allow for optimal separation of TCS,
STC, and other chlorosilane species coming from the effluent gas recovery
systems. SCC’s technology provides the following:
-
Recognition and
provisions for removal of additional impurities introduced inside the
bell jar reactors and subsequent process equipment.
-
TCS purity as good
as or better than the product TCS from the main purification train.
-
Path for removal of
chlorosilane heavies while minimizing the loss of STC.
|
-
Customized process will result in less off spec material recycled to feed
the polysilicon reactors. Less re-work of TCS and less low grade
polysilicon produced. Overall results = 10% more output of on-spec product
as compared to alternative.
-
10%
reduction in operating cost (energy, utilities, labor, materials).
|
|
|
Process Model /
Integration |
Detailed model
and point to point process material balance for the entire polysilicon
production plant. |
-
The process
model provides a tool to measure and evaluate the impact of the following
process variables:
-
Raw Materials. What
quality is needed? What is the cost of “quality” in terms of raw
material cost and the size and quantity of capital equipment within the
process due to the raw material choice made?
-
Intermediate
stream utilization and waste minimization. What can be sold as a
byproduct? If a stream cannot be sold, what are the options for
treatment and disposal? What streams can be recovered or recycled? What
impact will a recycle or recovery stream have on the final product
quality?
-
Polysilicon
production quality. What are the impacts on the quantity and size of
capital equipment based on a given quality? What are the impacts on
waste production due to a given product quality?
|
-
10%
overall capital expense reduction for TCS production, purification, and
effluent gas recovery due to proper design and sizing of equipment.
-
Improves overall design process through basic and detailed engineering.
Possible reduction in project schedule of 1-2 months.
-
Results in a simplified design that is more easily operated reducing
operating labor and maintenance cost by 10-15%.
|
|
|